the competition

When I was young, the youngest of 8, we didn't always have money for everything we wanted. It was:

  • Camping, instead of cruises;
  • Hand me downs, instead of new clothes;
  • Homemade clothes instead of store-bought;
  • Saltwater sandals instead of Barbie sneaks (the last one wasn't economical; the leather sandals cost more than the discount shoes. This was just my mom's way of making sure I looked different from the pack.)

I never felt the pinch. I was more than happy with Twinkies bought in bulk and frozen to stay fresh; cups of hot chocolate with whipped cream at Woolworth's; and my brother's old Levi's, rugby shirts and vintage Mad magazines.

There's more pressure on families today. Young families worry if they are buying enough of everything for their kids. Go deeply into debt buying the latest games, clothes and toys for their children. Buy bigger houses, better cars and more adult toys, too, to make sure they stay on top. But where does it all end?

As I got older, a series of events occurred that allowed a lot of changes in my life. Nicer restaurants. New clothes. Cars when I was old enough to drive. Obviously, this was a welcome change. but I never learned how to properly balance a checkbook, save money for a rainy day or even do simple mathematic equations. If I had to work my way through high school, would things have been different?

I was greatly inspired by Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead. The book pits man's creative instincts and individuality against the herd, and the powerful human spirit triumphs in the end. But there are aspects of Rand's writing that I don't accept as willingly. Aggressive capitalism and "winning" have never sat well with me.

I don't think you can compete with other people and ever really win. There's always someone who's smarter than you. More successful than you. Better looking than you. You shouldn't try to compete with other people. Finding inner peace. that's the real challenge. Accepting your flaws. Trying not to be so hard on yourself. Living your life by example. Allowing other people to warm themselves in your happy glow.

I've come a long way to self acceptance. It's an ongoing journey. A roller coaster ride of ups and downs. But I'm fortunate to have a loving family and an ever-widening group of friends who really care. I make mistakes. I do things the wrong way. I don't have that filter between my brain and my mouth that properly censors everything that I say. But the people who are most special to me wouldn't have it any other way. They've proven this to me time and time again since I became self employed. They don't care if I win. They think I've already won. Just by being me.

Because… even if you did win. If you had the best house on the street. The most expensive car. The biggest boat in the driveway. Would it ever be enough? Would it make you happier with you and your place in the world? I'm guessing no.

Or hell. maybe that's just the little lie I tell myself to be happy. So far, it's working. ~

Comments

Anonymous said…
Lisa,

Twinkies bought when you were a kid would still be fresh today without being frozen!

I'm an objectivist and I've spent a great many hours explaining to people that Rand was trying to dramatically illustrate notions associated with her philosophy. She was also fleshing it out contemporaneously. It's hard to really get a pragmatic grasp of the power of the philosophy from the Fountainhead, or even Atlas Shrugged.

I learned most of what I know discussing the concepts, or rather, fighting about them with very patient and thoughtful objectivists. It all boils down to this:

You have to live your life for YOU, but you have to do it as a moral creature of reason. That means you have to have a rational set of values. For instance, it's rational to value good will toward your fellow man, it's irrational to value his stuff but not his claim to it.

I (and many objectivists) hold that we should live our lives in a manner that furthers our rationally held values. That means that we are obligated to think about what's important to us and why, and what obtaining or furthering that would really mean to us and the world. Then we have to go about making that happen.

A lot of Objectivists (note the big "O" vs. my small "o" ) like to talk a tough game about rugged individualism and cutthrout capitalism and no charity, etc. etc. Frankly, I don't think that they've really thought it out.

There's another school of objectivism, however, a much more thoughtful approach, IMO. Dr. David Kelly was and I suppose still is largely behind it. I believe he and those like him are going to radically transform philosophy and many lives over time. I know they have me.

In any case, I recommend learning a bit about Kelly's approach to objectivism. I think you'll find it fascinating, and actually uplifting.

Here's a link to his introduction to "Un-rugged Individualism" (which I strongly recommend, too).

http://www.theobjectivistcenter.org/showcontent.aspx?ct=38&h=51

Best,
Mark
(p.s. you know where to reach me if you want more)
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said…
"Finding inner peace. that's the real challenge. Accepting your flaws. Trying not to be so hard on yourself. Living your life by example. Allowing other people to warm themselves in your happy glow."

Very well said.
Lisa said…
mark,

I have to think about your comment. I'm going to look at Kelly's site and see what he's got going out there.

thanks for the tip,

lisa
Lisa said…
dave: it's a journey! i'm still working on it.

thanks for the note.

:) lisa
Anonymous said…
The last thing you want is to come to the end of the line...

;)

Mark
Lisa said…
mark,

I have to think about your comment. I'm going to look at Kelly's site and see what he's got going out there.

thanks for the tip,

lisa
Mark said…
Lisa,

Twinkies bought when you were a kid would still be fresh today without being frozen!

I'm an objectivist and I've spent a great many hours explaining to people that Rand was trying to dramatically illustrate notions associated with her philosophy. She was also fleshing it out contemporaneously. It's hard to really get a pragmatic grasp of the power of the philosophy from the Fountainhead, or even Atlas Shrugged.

I learned most of what I know discussing the concepts, or rather, fighting about them with very patient and thoughtful objectivists. It all boils down to this:

You have to live your life for YOU, but you have to do it as a moral creature of reason. That means you have to have a rational set of values. For instance, it's rational to value good will toward your fellow man, it's irrational to value his stuff but not his claim to it.

I (and many objectivists) hold that we should live our lives in a manner that furthers our rationally held values. That means that we are obligated to think about what's important to us and why, and what obtaining or furthering that would really mean to us and the world. Then we have to go about making that happen.

A lot of Objectivists (note the big "O" vs. my small "o" ) like to talk a tough game about rugged individualism and cutthrout capitalism and no charity, etc. etc. Frankly, I don't think that they've really thought it out.

There's another school of objectivism, however, a much more thoughtful approach, IMO. Dr. David Kelly was and I suppose still is largely behind it. I believe he and those like him are going to radically transform philosophy and many lives over time. I know they have me.

In any case, I recommend learning a bit about Kelly's approach to objectivism. I think you'll find it fascinating, and actually uplifting.

Here's a link to his introduction to "Un-rugged Individualism" (which I strongly recommend, too).

http://www.theobjectivistcenter.org/showcontent.aspx?ct=38&h=51

Best,
Mark
(p.s. you know where to reach me if you want more)

Popular Posts